Men may appreciate them, but breasts are built for BABIES

Yeah yeah, everyone I know has linked to or sent me this article: Eyeful of breast-feeding mom sparks outrage.

So lemme get this straight; apparently this cover is “offensive” or “bad”:
060727_breastfeeding_cover_vmed.widec.jpg

And these are “good” or “okay” magazine covers that I’ve seen displayed on local newstands…
2004_4_th.jpgm3rs909p.jpgstuff-cover.jpg

Gotcha. Loud and clear.


roflmao at your tactic!

wish that first magazine was available over here so I could read it to show my support.

Isn’t it funny how that works?

Glad you posted this. I read it earlier and wanted to comment on my blog, but I was hesitant to get myself all worked up in my rant.

I found the most ridiculous bit to be “I don’t want my son or husband to accidentally see a breast they didn’t want to see.” Hah. What (straight) man or boy DOESN’T want to see breast/s?

Bravo.

Exactly!

Yeah I was one of the ones that forwarded it to Andrea. I was hoping that the more you see breasts on magazines for their intended purposes maybe the more people would think less of them sexually.

I mean nudists can just see a body and not body parts. Why can’t regular people just see something natural and beautiful instead.

Some people are soo DUUUH out there. I guess you could call me a lactivist because I am all for breastfeeding. I breastfed my daughter for 3 yrs (her choice not mine. I was happy with 2 yrs)I never ‘exposed’ myself in public but I did breastfeed in public because my child was hungry.

I wish people would get over it and congradulate women for a job well done!

Just MHO

Micheline

People are strange. There’s nothing provocative about that photo at all – and it’s about time there were pictures indicating what the darn things are for in the first place!





Pages