Men may appreciate them, but breasts are built for BABIES

Yeah yeah, everyone I know has linked to or sent me this article: Eyeful of breast-feeding mom sparks outrage.

So lemme get this straight; apparently this cover is “offensive” or “bad”:

And these are “good” or “okay” magazine covers that I’ve seen displayed on local newstands…

Gotcha. Loud and clear.

roflmao at your tactic!

wish that first magazine was available over here so I could read it to show my support.

Isn’t it funny how that works?

Glad you posted this. I read it earlier and wanted to comment on my blog, but I was hesitant to get myself all worked up in my rant.

I found the most ridiculous bit to be “I don’t want my son or husband to accidentally see a breast they didn’t want to see.” Hah. What (straight) man or boy DOESN’T want to see breast/s?



Yeah I was one of the ones that forwarded it to Andrea. I was hoping that the more you see breasts on magazines for their intended purposes maybe the more people would think less of them sexually.

I mean nudists can just see a body and not body parts. Why can’t regular people just see something natural and beautiful instead.

Some people are soo DUUUH out there. I guess you could call me a lactivist because I am all for breastfeeding. I breastfed my daughter for 3 yrs (her choice not mine. I was happy with 2 yrs)I never ‘exposed’ myself in public but I did breastfeed in public because my child was hungry.

I wish people would get over it and congradulate women for a job well done!

Just MHO


People are strange. There’s nothing provocative about that photo at all – and it’s about time there were pictures indicating what the darn things are for in the first place!